Justification (33)
Filter by:
  1. Scott and Caleb are joined by Drs. Jim Nestingen and Steve Paulson to discuss confession and absolution.
  2. My biggest criticism of Peterson’s mantra is that it seems to be exclusively a message of Law in a world in desperate need of grace.
  3. There is a difference between preaching about Christ and preaching Christ.
  4. As Christmas approaches, the Fellows take on a long time listener request to define our terms.
  5. Chad Bird joined the Thinking Fellows at the Here We Still Stand conference in San Diego to talk about his new book.
  6. As one of the last episodes in our latest series about the great ideas of the Reformation, we talk about the relationship between faith and reason.
  7. Just when we think we had it all under control, Christ breaks into the midst of our futile efforts to save ourselves.
  8. This short series has attempted to show that many, if not all, of the attempts that have been made to reveal or identify tensions or error in Melanchthon’s theology.
  9. At the same time, in the late 1520s and early 1530s, Melanchthon’s theology became utterly reliant on the idea that justification is a purely forensic act whereby the unjust sinner is declared just on account of Christ (propter Christum).
  10. Beginning in 1519, Melanchthon began to develop his theology.
  11. The doctrine of conversion is highly debated among Christians. The Thinking Fellows find their answer not so surprisingly away from logic and back in Christ. Sit back, relax, grab a drink, and enjoy the show.
  12. By Philip Melanchthon (from the 1535 Loci Communes), translated by Scott L. Keith, Ph.D., edited by Kurt Winrich
Loading...

No More Post

No more pages to load